↓ Skip to main content

Auricular acupuncture as effective pain relief after episiotomy: a randomized controlled pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Gynecology & Obstetrics, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters
Title
Auricular acupuncture as effective pain relief after episiotomy: a randomized controlled pilot study
Published in
Archives of Gynecology & Obstetrics, September 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00404-019-05283-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jaić, Katarina Kličan, Turković, Tihana Magdić, Pešić, Maja, Djaković, Ivka, Košec, Vesna, Košec, Andro

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2019.
All research outputs
#2,410,238
of 13,640,858 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Gynecology & Obstetrics
#107
of 1,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,277
of 219,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Gynecology & Obstetrics
#1
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,640,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,168 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 219,438 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.