↓ Skip to main content

ZIKAVID—Zika virus infection database: a new platform to analyze the molecular impact of Zika virus infection

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of NeuroVirology, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#29 of 657)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 tweeters
Title
ZIKAVID—Zika virus infection database: a new platform to analyze the molecular impact of Zika virus infection
Published in
Journal of NeuroVirology, September 2019
DOI 10.1007/s13365-019-00799-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rafael L. Rosa, Lucélia Santi, Markus Berger, Emanuela F. Tureta, André Quincozes-Santos, Diogo O. Souza, Jorge A. Guimarães, Walter O. Beys-da-Silva

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2019.
All research outputs
#1,501,610
of 13,617,861 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroVirology
#29
of 657 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,144
of 211,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroVirology
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,617,861 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 657 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,462 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them