↓ Skip to main content

Chronic Toxicological Effects of Carbamazepine on Daphnia magna Straus: Effects on Reproduction Traits, Body Length, and Intrinsic Growth

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of Environmental Contamination & Toxicology, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
Title
Chronic Toxicological Effects of Carbamazepine on Daphnia magna Straus: Effects on Reproduction Traits, Body Length, and Intrinsic Growth
Published in
Bulletin of Environmental Contamination & Toxicology, September 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00128-019-02715-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yu Tian, Xiaoming Xia, Jinhua Wang, Lusheng Zhu, Jun Wang, Fengzhao Zhang, Zulfiqar Ahmad

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2019.
All research outputs
#10,423,655
of 13,647,997 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Environmental Contamination & Toxicology
#1,893
of 2,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,558
of 226,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Environmental Contamination & Toxicology
#17
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,647,997 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,987 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,745 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.