| Title |
Recurrent non-canonical histone H3 mutations in spinal cord diffuse gliomas
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta Neuropathologica, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00401-019-02072-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emily A. Sloan, Tabitha Cooney, Nancy Ann Oberheim Bush, Robin Buerki, Jennie Taylor, Jennifer L. Clarke, Joseph Torkildson, Cassie Kline, Alyssa Reddy, Sabine Mueller, Anu Banerjee, Nicholas Butowski, Susan Chang, Praveen V. Mummaneni, Dean Chou, Lee Tan, Philip Theodosopoulos, Michael McDermott, Mitchel Berger, Corey Raffel, Nalin Gupta, Peter P. Sun, Yi Li, Vinil Shah, Soonmee Cha, Steve Braunstein, David R. Raleigh, David Samuel, David Scharnhorst, Cynthia Fata, Hua Guo, Gregory Moes, John Y. H. Kim, Carl Koschmann, Jessica Van Ziffle, Courtney Onodera, Patrick Devine, James P. Grenert, Julieann C. Lee, Melike Pekmezci, Joanna J. Phillips, Tarik Tihan, Andrew W. Bollen, Arie Perry, David A. Solomon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 60% |
| Spain | 1 | 10% |
| China | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
| Scientists | 3 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 4 | 20% |
| Researcher | 3 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 35% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 15% |
| Unknown | 4 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2019.
All research outputs
#2,037,099
of 23,163,378 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica
#485
of 2,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,632
of 340,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica
#27
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,163,378 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,823 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.