↓ Skip to main content

Age related human T cell subset evolution and senescence

Overview of attention for article published in Immunity & Ageing, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
Title
Age related human T cell subset evolution and senescence
Published in
Immunity & Ageing, September 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12979-019-0165-8
Authors

Mingde Li, Danlin Yao, Xiangbo Zeng, Dimitri Kasakovski, Yikai Zhang, Shaohua Chen, Xianfeng Zha, Yangqiu Li, Ling Xu

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2019.
All research outputs
#7,693,038
of 13,635,041 outputs
Outputs from Immunity & Ageing
#101
of 208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,846
of 221,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Immunity & Ageing
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,635,041 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 208 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,012 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them