↓ Skip to main content

Fire and Floods: The Recovery of Headwater Stream Systems Following High-Severity Wildfire

Overview of attention for article published in Fire Ecology, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Fire and Floods: The Recovery of Headwater Stream Systems Following High-Severity Wildfire
Published in
Fire Ecology, December 2017
DOI 10.4996/fireecology.130306284
Authors

Jackson M. Leonard, Hugo A. Magaña, Randy K. Bangert, Daniel G. Neary, Willson L. Montgomery

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 18%
Student > Master 5 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 9 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 21%
Environmental Science 5 15%
Engineering 3 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 6%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 15 45%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2019.
All research outputs
#5,612,998
of 17,375,479 outputs
Outputs from Fire Ecology
#70
of 119 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,767
of 270,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fire Ecology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,375,479 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 119 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them