↓ Skip to main content

Challenges to ethical obligations and humanitarian principles in conflict settings: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of International Humanitarian Action, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
Title
Challenges to ethical obligations and humanitarian principles in conflict settings: a systematic review
Published in
Journal of International Humanitarian Action, September 2019
DOI 10.1186/s41018-019-0063-x
Authors

Grant Broussard, Leonard S. Rubenstein, Courtland Robinson, Wasim Maziak, Sappho Z. Gilbert, Matthew DeCamp

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2019.
All research outputs
#2,186,351
of 13,612,446 outputs
Outputs from Journal of International Humanitarian Action
#43
of 59 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,585
of 211,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of International Humanitarian Action
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,612,446 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 59 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them