↓ Skip to main content

Model comparison in ANOVA

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
290 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Model comparison in ANOVA
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, April 2016
DOI 10.3758/s13423-016-1026-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey N. Rouder, Christopher R. Engelhardt, Simon McCabe, Richard D. Morey

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 290 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Bosnia and Herzegovina 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 279 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 17%
Student > Master 34 12%
Student > Bachelor 32 11%
Researcher 30 10%
Student > Postgraduate 14 5%
Other 35 12%
Unknown 97 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 69 24%
Engineering 19 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 3%
Neuroscience 10 3%
Other 63 22%
Unknown 109 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2020.
All research outputs
#7,259,661
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
#6
of 6 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,755
of 317,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
#10
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,735 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.