@michelnivard @NeuroMinded +1 to @NeuroMinded 's suggestion (perhaps for a future post). An overview of how the candidate gene debacle fit in would enrich the account- especially for people newer to the field. Hewitt's 2011/12 BG editorial was a huge miles
@AGallyer @procAnna A good read is the 2012 Editorial comment from the flagship journal of Behavioral Genetics, stating the journal policy of not publishing this work other than very specific circumstances. https://t.co/HV0OjfZruG. I shake my head when I s
@hakusan09 事実に間違いがありましたので訂正いたします。Behavior Genetics 誌では投稿自体は禁止はされていませんでした。ただし、かなり厳しい査読基準(同一論文内で独立なサンプルによる再現性を報告すること)が設けられています。以下参照元です。https://t.co/4OtRjSCvDc
@deevybee Maybe this paper? https://t.co/BKSXFhbPvN I know that Psychoneuroendocrinology, at least, follows these guidelines
RT @gidin: @neuroecology @Neuro_Skeptic @WiringTheBrain All SNP studies with less than 20K subjects are underpowered. https://t.co/N8b5MJOB…
@neuroecology @Neuro_Skeptic @WiringTheBrain All SNP studies with less than 20K subjects are underpowered. https://t.co/N8b5MJOBNI
Editorial policy on candidate gene association and candidate gene-by-environment interaction studies of co... http://t.co/XWLHLkfJ #GWAS
Connotea: Editorial Policy on Candidate Gene Association and Candidate Gene-by-Environment Interaction Studies o... http://t.co/XWnbEqwi
RT @hardsci: Wow. New Behavior Genetics ed policy requires direct replication in candidate-gene papers http://t.co/cYHHHMrR