| Title |
Piezo1 mechanosensitive channels: what are they and why are they important
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biophysical Reviews, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12551-019-00584-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pietro Ridone, Massimo Vassalli, Boris Martinac |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Belgium | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 259 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 259 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 17% |
| Researcher | 32 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 35 | 14% |
| Unknown | 79 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 58 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 16 | 6% |
| Engineering | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 40 | 15% |
| Unknown | 91 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2021.
All research outputs
#3,835,354
of 23,527,856 outputs
Outputs from Biophysical Reviews
#67
of 804 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,783
of 342,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biophysical Reviews
#4
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,527,856 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 804 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,249 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.