↓ Skip to main content

Intensity-dependent energetic costs in a reciprocal parasitic relationship

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Intensity-dependent energetic costs in a reciprocal parasitic relationship
Published in
Oecologia, September 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00442-019-04504-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Caroline Methling, Karel Douda, Martin Reichard

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 47%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Student > Master 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 32%
Environmental Science 5 26%
Chemical Engineering 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2019.
All research outputs
#15,581,198
of 23,163,378 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#3,283
of 4,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,531
of 341,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#39
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,163,378 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,248 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,020 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.