| Title |
Metabarcoding-based dietary analysis of hen harrier (Circus cyaneus) in Great Britain using buccal swabs from chicks
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Genetics, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10592-019-01215-y |
| URN |
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-399085
|
| Authors |
Kevin Nota, Stephen Downing, Arati Iyengar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 28% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 11% |
| Japan | 1 | 6% |
| Greece | 1 | 6% |
| South Africa | 1 | 6% |
| Ireland | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 72% |
| Scientists | 4 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 18% |
| Researcher | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 15 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 29% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 18 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,813,555
of 25,834,578 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#148
of 1,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,259
of 352,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#3
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,834,578 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.