↓ Skip to main content

Impact of species and antibiotic therapy of enterococcal peritonitis on 30-day mortality in critical care—an analysis of the OUTCOMEREA database

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 tweeters
Title
Impact of species and antibiotic therapy of enterococcal peritonitis on 30-day mortality in critical care—an analysis of the OUTCOMEREA database
Published in
Critical Care, September 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13054-019-2581-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne-Cécile Morvan, Baptiste Hengy, Maïté Garrouste-Orgeas, Stéphane Ruckly, Jean-Marie Forel, Laurent Argaud, Thomas Rimmelé, Jean-Pierre Bedos, Elie Azoulay, Claire Dupuis, Bruno Mourvillier, Carole Schwebel, Jean-François Timsit

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,472,715
of 13,622,686 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,397
of 4,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,767
of 219,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,622,686 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,320 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 219,296 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them