↓ Skip to main content

Growth and photosynthetic performance of Chlamydopodium fusiforme cells cultivated in BG11 and Bristol media

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Phycology, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
Title
Growth and photosynthetic performance of Chlamydopodium fusiforme cells cultivated in BG11 and Bristol media
Published in
Journal of Applied Phycology, September 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10811-019-01900-y
Authors

Eleftherios Touloupakis, Gabriele Tartari, Graziella Chini Zittelli, Giuseppe Torzillo

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2019.
All research outputs
#12,066,813
of 13,610,796 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Phycology
#868
of 1,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,879
of 206,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Phycology
#31
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,610,796 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,890 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.