| Title |
Desynchronizing effect of high-frequency stimulation in a generic cortical network model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cognitive Neurodynamics, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11571-012-9199-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Markus Schütt, Jens Christian Claussen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Austria | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 23 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
| Professor | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Unknown | 1 | 4% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 15% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 15% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 6 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2012.
All research outputs
#20,156,138
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Neurodynamics
#285
of 317 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,336
of 161,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Neurodynamics
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 317 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.