↓ Skip to main content

Support for a Link Between the Local Processing Bias and Social Deficits in Autism: An Investigation of Embedded Figures Test Performance in Non-Clinical Individuals

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
Title
Support for a Link Between the Local Processing Bias and Social Deficits in Autism: An Investigation of Embedded Figures Test Performance in Non-Clinical Individuals
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, March 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10803-012-1506-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suzanna N. Russell-Smith, Murray T. Maybery, Donna M. Bayliss, Adelln A. H. Sng

Abstract

The aim of this investigation was to explore the degree to which specific subsets of autistic-like traits relate to performance on the Embedded Figures Test (Witkin et al. in A manual for the embedded figures test. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA, 1971). In the first group-based investigation with this focus, students were selected for their extreme scores (either high or low) on each of the 'Social Skills' and 'Details/Patterns' factors of the Autism Spectrum Quotient (Baron-Cohen et al. in J Austim Dev Disord 31:5-17, 2001). The resulting 2 × 2 factorial design permitted examination of the degree to which the social and non-social autistic-like traits separately relate to EFT performance. Surprisingly, in two studies, superior EFT performance was found to relate only to greater social difficulty, suggesting that the local processing bias in autism may be linked specifically to the social deficits.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 117 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 21%
Student > Bachelor 24 20%
Student > Master 16 13%
Researcher 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 19 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 77 64%
Neuroscience 5 4%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 25 21%