@arifalbo Marvin Backes has a paper on the Lockean View and the problem of statistical evidence. There, he adds a footnote with a pretty exhaustive list of various defenders of the Lockean view. This is the paper (https://t.co/1E2j7IviPr), and this is the
RT @JustinCaouette: Epistemology and the law: why there is no epistemic mileage in legal cases https://t.co/2VrVkzcucU cc: @cmlittlejohn
RT @JustinCaouette: Epistemology and the law: why there is no epistemic mileage in legal cases https://t.co/2VrVkzcucU cc: @cmlittlejohn
Epistemology and the law: why there is no epistemic mileage in legal cases https://t.co/2VrVkzcucU cc: @cmlittlejohn
This debate is becoming increasingly more interesting, and it's keeping me up at night.
The newest publication from Marvin Backes is now available at Philosophical Studies! 👏👏👏 'Epistemology and the law: why there is no epistemic mileage in legal cases' is now available through Open Access. https://t.co/5YMesiUdBP
Epistemology and the law: why there is no epistemic mileage in legal cases https://t.co/LDiI0DxpMQ
RT @SpringerEthics: HOT 🌶️ off the digital press and open access - I feel a weekend read 👀 coming on! Epistemology and the law: why ther…
HOT 🌶️ off the digital press and open access - I feel a weekend read 👀 coming on! Epistemology and the law: why there is no epistemic mileage in legal cases https://t.co/UPOFcik6tw https://t.co/B9NCmqzL3o