↓ Skip to main content

Lung function evolution in children with old and new type bronchopulmonary dysplasia: a retrospective cohort analysis

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Pediatrics, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
Title
Lung function evolution in children with old and new type bronchopulmonary dysplasia: a retrospective cohort analysis
Published in
European Journal of Pediatrics, September 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00431-019-03453-1
Authors

Frederik Cardoen, François Vermeulen, Marijke Proesmans, Marleen Moens, Kris De Boeck

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2019.
All research outputs
#8,540,123
of 13,605,565 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Pediatrics
#1,679
of 2,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,573
of 207,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Pediatrics
#43
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,605,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,367 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,521 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.