↓ Skip to main content

Probiotics in health and disease: fooling Mother Nature?

Overview of attention for article published in Infection, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Probiotics in health and disease: fooling Mother Nature?
Published in
Infection, September 2019
DOI 10.1007/s15010-019-01351-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Muhammad Bilal Abid, Calvin J. Koh

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 25%
Student > Bachelor 2 17%
Student > Master 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Other 2 17%
Unknown 2 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Computer Science 1 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 8%
Other 3 25%
Unknown 2 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2019.
All research outputs
#8,876,334
of 14,163,335 outputs
Outputs from Infection
#623
of 939 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,334
of 255,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infection
#8
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,163,335 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 939 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,008 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.