↓ Skip to main content

Smart technology applications in the woody biomass supply chain: interview insights and potential in Japan

Overview of attention for article published in Sustainability Science, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
Title
Smart technology applications in the woody biomass supply chain: interview insights and potential in Japan
Published in
Sustainability Science, September 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11625-019-00728-2
Authors

Amanda Ahl, Mika Goto, Masaru Yarime

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2019.
All research outputs
#10,821,993
of 13,600,099 outputs
Outputs from Sustainability Science
#334
of 371 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,713
of 205,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sustainability Science
#13
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,600,099 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 371 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,866 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.