@StartsWithABang Axions do not exist. #DarkMatter is not particles. https://t.co/NB3VMdJouO
@newscientist Axions do not exist. #DarkMatter is not particles. https://t.co/NB3VMdJWkm
@NatureAstronomy @AlienPhysicist Axions do not exist. #DarkMatter is not particles. https://t.co/NB3VMdJouO
@physorg_com @ConversationEDU @NatureAstronomy Axions do not exist. #DarkMatter is not particles. https://t.co/NB3VMdJouO
@newscientist Axions do not exist. #DarkMatter is not particles. https://t.co/NB3VMdJouO
Non-particle dark matter from Hubble parameter https://t.co/RvCemEnEYB
@NASA Simple solution: dark matter has a small, negative pressure and therefore it is not composed from particles, contrary to what is assumed in standard cosmology. https://t.co/NB3VMdJouO
@esascience @HUBBLE_space Simple solution: dark matter has a small, negative pressure and therefore it is not composed from particles, contrary to what is assumed in standard cosmology. https://t.co/NB3VMdJouO
@seanmcarroll Simple solution: dark matter has a small, negative pressure and therefore it is not composed from particles, contrary to what is assumed in standard cosmology. https://t.co/NB3VMdJouO
@PhysRevLett Simple solution: dark matter has a small, negative pressure and therefore it is not composed from particles, contrary to what is assumed in standard cosmology. https://t.co/NB3VMdJouO
@physorg_com @PhysRevLett Simple solution: dark matter has a small, negative pressure and therefore it is not composed from particles, contrary to what is assumed in standard cosmology. https://t.co/NB3VMdJouO
@QuantaMagazine Simple solution: dark matter has a small, negative pressure and therefore it is not composed from particles, contrary to what is assumed in standard cosmology. https://t.co/NB3VMdJouO
@sciam Simple solution: dark matter has a small, negative pressure and therefore it is not composed from particles, contrary to what is assumed in standard cosmology. https://t.co/NB3VMdJouO
@SPACEdotcom Simple solution: dark matter has a small, negative pressure and therefore it is not composed from particles, contrary to what is assumed in standard cosmology. https://t.co/NB3VMdJouO
RT @GregorioBaquer5: @PabloGallegos1 @marongwe_stuart @human_wavfunctn @humblerock In any case there has been some recent papers that get r…
RT @GregorioBaquer5: @PabloGallegos1 @marongwe_stuart @human_wavfunctn @humblerock In any case there has been some recent papers that get r…
@PabloGallegos1 @marongwe_stuart @human_wavfunctn @humblerock In any case there has been some recent papers that get really close to what I propose from the mathematical point of view: https://t.co/H596P0MOzr and https://t.co/Xj3Whwnyeq
RT @NikoPoplawski: The Hubble parameter measurement discrepancy goes away if #DarkMatter is not particles. https://t.co/x0CMrKhGIt
RT @NikoPoplawski: The Hubble parameter measurement discrepancy goes away if #DarkMatter is not particles. https://t.co/x0CMrKhGIt
RT @NikoPoplawski: The Hubble parameter measurement discrepancy goes away if #DarkMatter is not particles. https://t.co/x0CMrKhGIt
The Hubble parameter measurement discrepancy goes away if #DarkMatter is not particles. https://t.co/x0CMrKhGIt
Non-particle dark matter from Hubble parameter https://t.co/uE372vfXuq via @SpringerPhysics https://t.co/3vkEE2fQFT