↓ Skip to main content

Dynamics of Entanglement of Two Atoms in Two Dissipative Cavities in the Double Jaynes-Cummings Models

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Theoretical Physics, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
Title
Dynamics of Entanglement of Two Atoms in Two Dissipative Cavities in the Double Jaynes-Cummings Models
Published in
International Journal of Theoretical Physics, September 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10773-019-04249-7
Authors

Qin Xie, Jiang Huang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2019.
All research outputs
#11,080,283
of 13,960,267 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Theoretical Physics
#422
of 1,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,143
of 254,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Theoretical Physics
#15
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,960,267 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,130 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.