| Title |
Dynamics of Entanglement of Two Atoms in Two Dissipative Cavities in the Double Jaynes-Cummings Models
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Theoretical Physics, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10773-019-04249-7 |
| Authors |
Qin Xie, Jiang Huang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2019.
All research outputs
#18,028,437
of 23,155,957 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Theoretical Physics
#478
of 1,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238,442
of 340,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Theoretical Physics
#11
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,155,957 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,815 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.