↓ Skip to main content

Removal of DNA-fragmented spermatozoa using flow cytometry and sorting does not improve the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Assisted Reproduction & Genetics, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Removal of DNA-fragmented spermatozoa using flow cytometry and sorting does not improve the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection
Published in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction & Genetics, August 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10815-019-01571-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christian De Geyter, Ursula Gobrecht-Keller, Astrid Ahler, Manuel Fischer

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2019.
All research outputs
#11,074,207
of 13,953,606 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Assisted Reproduction & Genetics
#666
of 974 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,003
of 254,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Assisted Reproduction & Genetics
#28
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,953,606 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 974 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.