Title |
The correlation between editorial delay and the ratio of highly cited papers in Nature, Science and Physical Review Letters
|
---|---|
Published in |
Scientometrics, April 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11192-016-1936-z |
Authors |
Zhenquan Lin, Shanci Hou, Jinshan Wu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 12% |
Switzerland | 2 | 12% |
Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
Russia | 1 | 6% |
India | 1 | 6% |
Italy | 1 | 6% |
Hong Kong | 1 | 6% |
Taiwan | 1 | 6% |
France | 1 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 18% |
Unknown | 3 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 9 | 53% |
Members of the public | 7 | 41% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 30 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 16% |
Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
Researcher | 4 | 13% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 10% |
Other | 8 | 26% |
Unknown | 4 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 8 | 26% |
Computer Science | 5 | 16% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 6% |
Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 23% |
Unknown | 6 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2019.
All research outputs
#3,555,683
of 22,860,626 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#708
of 2,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,977
of 300,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#13
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,860,626 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,683 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,819 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.