↓ Skip to main content

Upper bounds for the number of spanning trees of graphs

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Inequalities and Applications, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#10 of 175)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Upper bounds for the number of spanning trees of graphs
Published in
Journal of Inequalities and Applications, November 2012
DOI 10.1186/1029-242x-2012-269
Authors

Ş Burcu Bozkurt

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 1 33%
Lecturer 1 33%
Student > Master 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 1 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 33%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2019.
All research outputs
#6,569,493
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Inequalities and Applications
#10
of 175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,503
of 284,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Inequalities and Applications
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 175 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,939 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them