↓ Skip to main content

Pulsatile tinnitus —a review of 84 patients

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, March 1998
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions
Title
Pulsatile tinnitus —a review of 84 patients
Published in
Journal of Neurology, March 1998
DOI 10.1007/s004150050193
Authors

Daniel Waldvogel, Heinrich P. Mattle, Matthias Sturzenegger, Gerhard Schroth

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2019.
All research outputs
#4,048,416
of 13,538,736 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#810
of 2,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,163
of 179,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#18
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,538,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,596 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.