| Title |
Pulsatile tinnitus —a review of 84 patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Neurology, March 1998
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s004150050193 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel Waldvogel, Heinrich P. Mattle, Matthias Sturzenegger, Gerhard Schroth |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 4% |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 67 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 18% |
| Unknown | 18 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 50% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 20 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2020.
All research outputs
#4,792,600
of 23,155,957 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#1,234
of 4,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,354
of 32,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,155,957 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,546 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 32,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them