Bias from self selection and loss to follow-up in prospective cohort studies

RT @GuidoBiele: @noelTbrewer @dggoldst I think I did not express myself clear enough. My view is that if one wants to claim that results ar…

@noelTbrewer @dggoldst I think I did not express myself clear enough. My view is that if one wants to claim that results are "the same" across samples one needs to run something like an equivalence test or ROPE procedure to support such a claim. https://t.

@KouMurayama @dingding_peng Weights work generally (prov. suff. N) can produce noisier estimates. What method "works" depends on DGP: If bias is due to conditioning on a collider, weighting it is, if it is due to effect modification, standardization/post

@brettjgall @LuHaidong @RexDouglass I fear this is too short for me to understand. Do you mean cond. on a coll. opens a path that leads to selection bias? I agree (https://t.co/4qEonepD5C ). I tried to say is that if one defines biases by from DGPs, then

Nice article! I would be even happier if they had cited our paper here https://t.co/4qEonepD5C, where we described/distinguished the two types of selection bias discussed in @LuHaidong and colleagues paper and also describe approached to dealing with them

@SolomonKurz I used this for large data sets and MI in a Bayesian approach: https://t.co/4qEone82e4 & https://t.co/6lWNMOe4GO Otherwise I'd use ORT.

RT @kaz_yos: Bias from self selection and loss to follow-up in prospective cohort studies | SpringerLink https://t.co/fBF120g61c

RT @kaz_yos: Bias from self selection and loss to follow-up in prospective cohort studies | SpringerLink https://t.co/fBF120g61c

RT @jon_y_huang: This is important fundamental work for birth cohort studies #epitwitter https://t.co/QwJQgVf0eU

RT @kaz_yos: Bias from self selection and loss to follow-up in prospective cohort studies | SpringerLink https://t.co/fBF120g61c

RT @henning_lars: Sounds like important lessons for us s(CAN)dinavians proud on our registers. A norwegian study. https://t.co/QhKmXQXG4e

RT @henning_lars: Sounds like important lessons for us s(CAN)dinavians proud on our registers. A norwegian study. https://t.co/QhKmXQXG4e

Sounds like important lessons for us s(CAN)dinavians proud on our registers. A norwegian study.

RT @jon_y_huang: This is important fundamental work for birth cohort studies #epitwitter https://t.co/QwJQgVf0eU

RT @jon_y_huang: This is important fundamental work for birth cohort studies #epitwitter https://t.co/QwJQgVf0eU

This is important fundamental work for birth cohort studies #epitwitter

Bias from self selection and loss to follow-up in prospective cohort studies | SpringerLink https://t.co/fBF120g61c