↓ Skip to main content

Are combined bleaching techniques better than their sole application? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Oral Investigations, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Are combined bleaching techniques better than their sole application? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Clinical Oral Investigations, August 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00784-019-03042-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andres Felipe Millan Cardenas, Bianca Medeiros Maran, Lucila Cristina Rodrigues Araújo, Fabiana Suelen Figuerêdo de Siqueira, Letícia Maíra Wambier, Carla Castiglia Gonzaga, Alessandro D. Loguercio, Alessandra Reis

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 43%
Professor 2 29%
Student > Postgraduate 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 71%
Unknown 2 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2019.
All research outputs
#11,420,284
of 14,403,834 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Oral Investigations
#489
of 798 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,419
of 256,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Oral Investigations
#12
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,403,834 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 798 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.