| Title |
Competition between social and market renting: a theoretical application of the structure-conduct-performance paradigm
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10901-012-9276-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christian Lennartz, Marietta Haffner, Michael Oxley |
| Abstract |
Housing policies in many countries have become more market orientated as the role of governments has shifted from the direct supply and funding of non-market housing towards the role of a regulator and facilitator. Central to this development is the notion that providers of social housing have to become more competitive. Arguably, these social housing changes have important implications for the relationship between social and market rented housing and thus the rental market as a whole. Conceptual frameworks that facilitate the understanding of this relationship are sparse commodities. This paper seeks to develop a theoretical framework that can be used to shed light on the conditions, processes, and effects of the new relation between the two rental tenures from an economic competition viewpoint. Therefore, this paper adapts the structure-conduct-performance paradigm to rented housing and discusses the framework's applicability and value on a theoretical level. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 10% |
| Researcher | 5 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 19% |
| Unknown | 17 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 11 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 15% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 22% |
| Unknown | 18 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2012.
All research outputs
#14,512,167
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Housing and the Built Environment
#182
of 267 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,907
of 179,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Housing and the Built Environment
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 267 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,094 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them