↓ Skip to main content

The Roman Eifel Aqueduct: archaeoseismological evidence for neotectonic movement at the transition of the Eifel to the Lower Rhine Embayment

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Earth Sciences, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 207)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
53 tweeters
Title
The Roman Eifel Aqueduct: archaeoseismological evidence for neotectonic movement at the transition of the Eifel to the Lower Rhine Embayment
Published in
International Journal of Earth Sciences, August 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00531-019-01766-y
Authors

G. Hoffmann, S. Kummer, R. Márquez, M. Valdivia Manchego

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2019.
All research outputs
#265,410
of 13,603,280 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Earth Sciences
#1
of 207 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,607
of 212,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Earth Sciences
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,603,280 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 207 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them