| Title |
Terrestrial Behavior in Titi Monkeys (Callicebus, Cheracebus, and Plecturocebus): Potential Correlates, Patterns, and Differences between Genera
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Primatology, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10764-019-00105-x |
| Authors |
João Pedro Souza-Alves, Italo Mourthe, Renato R. Hilário, Júlio César Bicca-Marques, Jennifer Rehg, Carla C. Gestich, Adriana C. Acero-Murcia, Patrice Adret, Rolando Aquino, Mélissa Berthet, Mark Bowler, Armando M. Calouro, Gustavo R. Canale, Nayara de A. Cardoso, Christini B. Caselli, Cristiane Cäsar, Renata R. D. Chagas, Aryanne Clyvia, Cintia F. Corsini, Thomas Defler, Anneke DeLuycker, Anthony Di Fiore, Kimberly Dingess, Gideon Erkenswick, Michele Alves Ferreira, Eduardo Fernandez-Duque, Stephen F. Ferrari, Isadora P. Fontes, Josimar Daniel Gomes, Frederico P. R. Gonçalves, Maurício Guerra, Torbjørn Haugaasen, Stefanie Heiduck, Eckhard W. Heymann, Shannon Hodges, Rosario Huashuayo-Llamocca, Leandro Jerusalinsky, Carlos Benhur Kasper, Jenna Lawrence, Teresa Magdalena Lueffe, Karine G. D. Lopes, Jesús Martínez, Fabiano R. de Melo, Mariluce Rezende Messias, Mariana B. Nagy-Reis, Inés Nole, Filipa Paciência, Erwin Palacios, Alice Poirier, Grasiela Porfírio, Amy Porter, Eluned Price, Rodrigo C. Printes, Erika P. Quintino, Evandro Amato Reis, Alessandro Rocha, Adriana Rodríguez, Fábio Röhe, Damian Rumiz, Sam Shanee, Marina M. Santana, Eleonore Z. F. Setz, Francisco Salatiel C. de Souza, Wilson Spironello, Emérita R. Tirado Herrera, Luana Vinhas, Kevina Vulinec, Robert B. Wallace, Mrinalini Watsa, Patricia C. Wright, Robert J. Young, Adrian A. Barnett |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 27% |
| Brazil | 2 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Colombia | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 9 | 60% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 14% |
| Researcher | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 19% |
| Unknown | 16 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 34% |
| Environmental Science | 10 | 17% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Psychology | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 14 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2022.
All research outputs
#2,215,075
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Primatology
#151
of 1,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,148
of 341,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Primatology
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,134 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.