↓ Skip to main content

Forced Inefficiencies of the Electronic Health Record

Overview of attention for article published in JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
44 tweeters
Title
Forced Inefficiencies of the Electronic Health Record
Published in
JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine, August 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11606-019-05281-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Weiner

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2019.
All research outputs
#338,809
of 13,615,200 outputs
Outputs from JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine
#283
of 4,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,608
of 226,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine
#6
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,615,200 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,895 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.