↓ Skip to main content

Defining, measuring and interpreting the appropriateness of humanitarian assistance

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of International Humanitarian Action, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Defining, measuring and interpreting the appropriateness of humanitarian assistance
Published in
Journal of International Humanitarian Action, August 2019
DOI 10.1186/s41018-019-0062-y
Authors

Nada Abdelmagid, Francesco Checchi, Sylvia Garry, Abdihamid Warsame

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 20%
Unspecified 5 12%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 11 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 6 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 15%
Unspecified 5 12%
Engineering 4 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 7%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 12 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2020.
All research outputs
#3,247,168
of 23,154,520 outputs
Outputs from Journal of International Humanitarian Action
#82
of 126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,804
of 340,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of International Humanitarian Action
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,154,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 126 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,585 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.