↓ Skip to main content

Environmental neglect: endocrine disruptors as underappreciated but potentially modifiable diabetes risk factors

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetologia, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
Title
Environmental neglect: endocrine disruptors as underappreciated but potentially modifiable diabetes risk factors
Published in
Diabetologia, August 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00125-019-4940-z
Authors

Robert M. Sargis, Rebecca A. Simmons

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2019.
All research outputs
#1,032,526
of 13,600,099 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#608
of 3,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,501
of 213,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#32
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,600,099 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,883 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.