↓ Skip to main content

Editorial overview: theoretical traditions in social values for sustainability

Overview of attention for article published in Sustainability Science, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
Title
Editorial overview: theoretical traditions in social values for sustainability
Published in
Sustainability Science, August 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11625-019-00723-7
Authors

Christopher M. Raymond, Jasper O. Kenter, Carena J. van Riper, Andrea Rawluk, Dave Kendal

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2019.
All research outputs
#3,833,699
of 13,647,747 outputs
Outputs from Sustainability Science
#185
of 374 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,615
of 235,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sustainability Science
#11
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,647,747 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 374 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.