↓ Skip to main content

Usable Pasts Forum: Critically Engaging Food Security

Overview of attention for article published in African Archaeological Review, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 193)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
20 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
9 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Usable Pasts Forum: Critically Engaging Food Security
Published in
African Archaeological Review, August 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10437-019-09347-9
Authors

Amanda L. Logan, Daryl Stump, Steven T. Goldstein, Emuobosa Akpo Orijemie, M. H. Schoeman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 33%
Other 1 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Lecturer 1 17%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 2 33%
Unspecified 2 33%
Environmental Science 1 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 189. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2020.
All research outputs
#78,427
of 14,162,642 outputs
Outputs from African Archaeological Review
#1
of 193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,477
of 253,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age from African Archaeological Review
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,162,642 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,498 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them