Title |
A Critical Analysis of the Sources of Reading Recovery: An Empiricist Perspective
|
---|---|
Published in |
Interchange, March 2004
|
DOI | 10.1023/b:inch.0000039021.15493.8d |
Authors |
Patrick Groff |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 27% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 7% |
Researcher | 1 | 7% |
Other | 2 | 13% |
Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 6 | 40% |
Psychology | 2 | 13% |
Unknown | 7 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2019.
All research outputs
#4,370,146
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Interchange
#12
of 266 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,596
of 63,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Interchange
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 266 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 63,047 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them