↓ Skip to main content

Development and evaluation of a novel simulation model for transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair

Overview of attention for article published in Hernia, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Development and evaluation of a novel simulation model for transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair
Published in
Hernia, August 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10029-019-02032-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

G. Ivakhov, A. Kolygin, S. Titkova, M. Anurov, A. Sazhin

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 50%
Student > Bachelor 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2019.
All research outputs
#12,672,100
of 14,334,469 outputs
Outputs from Hernia
#474
of 687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,845
of 254,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hernia
#28
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,334,469 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 687 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.