↓ Skip to main content

Clinical Implications of Conversion Surgery After Induction Therapy for T4b Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
Title
Clinical Implications of Conversion Surgery After Induction Therapy for T4b Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, August 2019
DOI 10.1245/s10434-019-07727-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hiroshi Miyata, Keijirou Sugimura, Masaaki Motoori, Takeshi Omori, Kazuyoshi Yamamoto, Yoshitomo Yanagimoto, Naoki Shinno, Masayoshi Yasui, Hidenori Takahashi, Hiroshi Wada, Masayuki Ohue, Masahiko Yano

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2019.
All research outputs
#6,825,156
of 13,435,322 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#1,674
of 3,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,868
of 127,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#42
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,435,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,213 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,666 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.