↓ Skip to main content

Summary of lecture at biophysics and structural biology at synchrotrons workshop Crystallography 101: diffraction theory and space groups

Overview of attention for article published in Biophysical Reviews, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
Title
Summary of lecture at biophysics and structural biology at synchrotrons workshop Crystallography 101: diffraction theory and space groups
Published in
Biophysical Reviews, July 2019
DOI 10.1007/s12551-019-00576-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elspeth F. Garman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2019.
All research outputs
#10,995,062
of 13,855,981 outputs
Outputs from Biophysical Reviews
#201
of 378 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,705
of 251,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biophysical Reviews
#25
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,855,981 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 378 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.