@LetsBeJerks @YopuSime @lavern_spicer @POTUS Here are 2 peer reviewed papers from 2019. https://t.co/tFvqpAy1jg https://t.co/RSDXa2p4np https://t.co/MsYjcUefHW
RT @JAA00197397: El tan mentado reporte de la EFSA -plagiado de informes provenientes de Monsanto- y que los pseudoescépticos usaban como e…
RT @JAA00197397: El tan mentado reporte de la EFSA -plagiado de informes provenientes de Monsanto- y que los pseudoescépticos usaban como e…
"#EFSA omits relevant available studies, selectively cites information, misquotes studies, fails to acknowledge uncertainties, fails to call for further research where needed, and fails to critically interpret studies and their findings." https://t.co/tFk
RT @ArnaudApoteker: A critical evaluation of EFSA’s environmental risk assessment of #GMO maize MON810 for honeybees and earthworms. The ne…
RT @LFerreirim: Las #abejas y las lombrices de tierra son esenciales, los cultivos #transgénicos no son necesarios. Este estudio revela qu…
RT @LFerreirim: Las #abejas y las lombrices de tierra son esenciales, los cultivos #transgénicos no son necesarios. Este estudio revela qu…
RT @LFerreirim: Las #abejas y las lombrices de tierra son esenciales, los cultivos #transgénicos no son necesarios. Este estudio revela qu…
RT @ArnaudApoteker: A critical evaluation of EFSA’s environmental risk assessment of #GMO maize MON810 for honeybees and earthworms. The ne…
RT @ArnaudApoteker: A critical evaluation of EFSA’s environmental risk assessment of #GMO maize MON810 for honeybees and earthworms. The ne…
A critical evaluation of EFSA’s environmental risk assessment of #GMO maize MON810 for honeybees and earthworms. The new study shows that @EFSA_EU has done a lousy job in order to get MON810 authorized https://t.co/fLZRJEFlzO
RT @SafaniaEriksen: A critical evaluation of EFSA’s environmental risk assessment of genetically modified maize MON810 for honeybees and ea…
RT @LFerreirim: Las #abejas y las lombrices de tierra son esenciales, los cultivos #transgénicos no son necesarios. Este estudio revela qu…
RT @LFerreirim: Las #abejas y las lombrices de tierra son esenciales, los cultivos #transgénicos no son necesarios. Este estudio revela qu…
RT @LFerreirim: Las #abejas y las lombrices de tierra son esenciales, los cultivos #transgénicos no son necesarios. Este estudio revela qu…
RT @LFerreirim: Las #abejas y las lombrices de tierra son esenciales, los cultivos #transgénicos no son necesarios. Este estudio revela qu…
Ny forskning viser at EFSA har problemer med pålideligheden af deres risikovurdering af GMO majs ift. påvirkning af honningbier og regnorme: https://t.co/No1zXgtMSh
"My research would support the call by the European Parliament and NGOs on the European Commission to withdraw its Draft implementing decision intended to renew the authorisation of MON810 cultivation." #GM #Transgénicos #MON810
RT @LFerreirim: Las #abejas y las lombrices de tierra son esenciales, los cultivos #transgénicos no son necesarios. Este estudio revela qu…
RT @SafaniaEriksen: A critical evaluation of EFSA’s environmental risk assessment of genetically modified maize MON810 for honeybees and ea…
RT @LFerreirim: Las #abejas y las lombrices de tierra son esenciales, los cultivos #transgénicos no son necesarios. Este estudio revela qu…
RT @LFerreirim: Las #abejas y las lombrices de tierra son esenciales, los cultivos #transgénicos no son necesarios. Este estudio revela qu…
RT @LFerreirim: Las #abejas y las lombrices de tierra son esenciales, los cultivos #transgénicos no son necesarios. Este estudio revela qu…
RT @SafaniaEriksen: A critical evaluation of EFSA’s environmental risk assessment of genetically modified maize MON810 for honeybees and ea…
RT @GMWatch: EFSA omits relevant available studies, selectively cites information, misquotes studies, fails to acknowledge uncertainties, f…
Las #abejas y las lombrices de tierra son esenciales, los cultivos #transgénicos no son necesarios. Este estudio revela que la evaluación de riesgos del maíz #transgénico MON810 (el que se siembra en España), no es de fiar. @Teresaribera @LuisPlanas h
A critical evaluation of EFSA’s environmental risk assessment of genetically modified maize MON810 for honeybees and earthworms https://t.co/No1zXgtMSh
RT @GMWatch: EFSA omits relevant available studies, selectively cites information, misquotes studies, fails to acknowledge uncertainties, f…
RT @GMWatch: EFSA omits relevant available studies, selectively cites information, misquotes studies, fails to acknowledge uncertainties, f…
RT @GMWatch: EFSA omits relevant available studies, selectively cites information, misquotes studies, fails to acknowledge uncertainties, f…
RT @GMWatch: EFSA omits relevant available studies, selectively cites information, misquotes studies, fails to acknowledge uncertainties, f…
RT @GMWatch: EFSA omits relevant available studies, selectively cites information, misquotes studies, fails to acknowledge uncertainties, f…
RT @GMWatch: EFSA omits relevant available studies, selectively cites information, misquotes studies, fails to acknowledge uncertainties, f…
RT @GMWatch: EFSA omits relevant available studies, selectively cites information, misquotes studies, fails to acknowledge uncertainties, f…
RT @Jeroen_vdSluijs: A critical evaluation of EFSA’s environmental risk assessment of genetically modified maize MON810 for honeybees and e…
Studie kritisiert #EFSA -Einschätzung der Wirkung von GMO-Mais (#MON810) auf Honigbienen und Regenwürmer. #GMO #EFSA https://t.co/2xIeRpEdAg Author: ...EFSA GMO Panel produces low-quality scientific advice, which is inconsistent with the Authority Mission
RT @Jeroen_vdSluijs: A critical evaluation of EFSA’s environmental risk assessment of genetically modified maize MON810 for honeybees and e…
A critical evaluation of EFSA’s environmental risk assessment of genetically modified maize MON810 for honeybees and earthworms https://t.co/gyTltWyO9D
RT @Jack_Heinemann: @SFuntowicz @Olivefarmer Great line: "Those responsible for food safety...within the EU would be well advised to recons…
@SFuntowicz @Olivefarmer Great line: "Those responsible for food safety...within the EU would be well advised to reconsider the scientific reliability of the advice given by EFSA in this area and to seek alternative and, perhaps, less complacent sources of