↓ Skip to main content

A critical evaluation of EFSA’s environmental risk assessment of genetically modified maize MON810 for honeybees and earthworms

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Sciences Europe, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#24 of 199)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
47 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
Title
A critical evaluation of EFSA’s environmental risk assessment of genetically modified maize MON810 for honeybees and earthworms
Published in
Environmental Sciences Europe, August 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12302-019-0238-5
Authors

Veronika Chvátalová

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2019.
All research outputs
#452,100
of 13,514,031 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Sciences Europe
#24
of 199 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,384
of 178,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Sciences Europe
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,514,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them