↓ Skip to main content

Mechanisms of contextual cueing: A tutorial review

Overview of attention for article published in Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
Title
Mechanisms of contextual cueing: A tutorial review
Published in
Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, August 2019
DOI 10.3758/s13414-019-01832-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Caitlin A. Sisk, Roger W. Remington, Yuhong V. Jiang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2019.
All research outputs
#8,479,359
of 13,521,117 outputs
Outputs from Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
#540
of 1,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,487
of 169,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
#6
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,521,117 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,354 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,311 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.