↓ Skip to main content

Inequities in breast cancer treatment in sub-Saharan Africa: findings from a prospective multi-country observational study

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 tweeters
Title
Inequities in breast cancer treatment in sub-Saharan Africa: findings from a prospective multi-country observational study
Published in
Breast Cancer Research, August 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13058-019-1174-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Milena Foerster, Benjamin O. Anderson, Fiona McKenzie, Moses Galukande, Angelica Anele, Charles Adisa, Annelle Zietsman, Joachim Schuz, Isabel dos Santos Silva, Valerie McCormack

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2019.
All research outputs
#1,287,937
of 13,429,401 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research
#169
of 1,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,011
of 125,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,429,401 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,507 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them