↓ Skip to main content

A role of age-dependent DNA methylation reprogramming in regulating the regeneration capacity of Boea hygrometrica leaves

Overview of attention for article published in Functional & Integrative Genomics, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
Title
A role of age-dependent DNA methylation reprogramming in regulating the regeneration capacity of Boea hygrometrica leaves
Published in
Functional & Integrative Genomics, August 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10142-019-00701-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Run-Ze Sun, En-Hui Zuo, Jin-Feng Qi, Yang Liu, Chih-Ta Lin, Xin Deng

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2019.
All research outputs
#10,309,362
of 13,516,269 outputs
Outputs from Functional & Integrative Genomics
#149
of 325 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,505
of 167,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Functional & Integrative Genomics
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,516,269 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 325 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.