| Title |
Diagnosis and management of metabolic acidosis: guidelines from a French expert panel
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-019-0563-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Boris Jung, Mikaël Martinez, Yann-Erick Claessens, Michaël Darmon, Kada Klouche, Alexandre Lautrette, Jacques Levraut, Eric Maury, Mathieu Oberlin, Nicolas Terzi, Damien Viglino, Youri Yordanov, Pierre-Géraud Claret, Naïke Bigé |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 67 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 13 | 19% |
| France | 5 | 7% |
| Ecuador | 4 | 6% |
| Colombia | 4 | 6% |
| Peru | 2 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
| Honduras | 1 | 1% |
| Czechia | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 32 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 61 | 91% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 7% |
| Scientists | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 380 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 380 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 46 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 45 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 38 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 36 | 9% |
| Researcher | 21 | 6% |
| Other | 62 | 16% |
| Unknown | 132 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 177 | 47% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 14 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 3% |
| Engineering | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 16 | 4% |
| Unknown | 138 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2022.
All research outputs
#962,678
of 25,721,020 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#102
of 1,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,075
of 353,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#1
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,721,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,866 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.