↓ Skip to main content

High expression of GUS activities in sweet potato storage roots by sucrose-inducible minimal promoter

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Cell Reports, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
Title
High expression of GUS activities in sweet potato storage roots by sucrose-inducible minimal promoter
Published in
Plant Cell Reports, August 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00299-019-02453-7
Authors

Youhei Honma, Takashi Yamakawa

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2019.
All research outputs
#10,750,171
of 13,514,491 outputs
Outputs from Plant Cell Reports
#1,273
of 1,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,511
of 212,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Cell Reports
#21
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,514,491 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,624 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.