↓ Skip to main content

Prenatal diagnosis of genetic diseases directly using paper-dried cord blood as the starting material for PCR

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
Title
Prenatal diagnosis of genetic diseases directly using paper-dried cord blood as the starting material for PCR
Published in
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, August 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00216-019-02048-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Huan Huang, You Zhou, Jiajia Zhang, Weiyin Yao, Guoying Zhang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2019.
All research outputs
#10,750,182
of 13,514,491 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#3,141
of 5,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,511
of 212,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#147
of 258 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,514,491 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,149 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 258 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.