↓ Skip to main content

DynOVis: a web tool to study dynamic perturbations for capturing dose-over-time effects in biological networks

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 tweeters
Title
DynOVis: a web tool to study dynamic perturbations for capturing dose-over-time effects in biological networks
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, August 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12859-019-2995-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

T. J. M. Kuijpers, J. E. J. Wolters, J. C. S. Kleinjans, D. G. J. Jennen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2019.
All research outputs
#1,665,345
of 13,466,037 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#699
of 5,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,079
of 193,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,466,037 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,033 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,300 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them