| Title |
Randomized Controlled Trial to Reduce Bacterial Colonization of Surgical Drains with the Use of Chlorhexidine-Coated Dressings After Breast Cancer Surgery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1245/s10434-019-07631-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Frida Rivera-Buendía, Rafael Franco-Cendejas, Cristina Guadalupe Román-López, Claudia Adriana Colín-Castro, Noé Becerra-Lobato, María de Lourdes García-Hernández, Patricia Cornejo-Juárez, Juan Enrique Bargalló-Rocha, Heriberto Medina-Franco, Diana Vilar-Compte |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 25% |
| Mexico | 1 | 8% |
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| Kenya | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 42% |
| Scientists | 3 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 8% |
| Researcher | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 25 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 27 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2019.
All research outputs
#4,216,832
of 23,153,849 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#1,279
of 6,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,597
of 346,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#52
of 145 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,568 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 145 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.